Wisconsin judge: Lawsuit to repeal abortion ban can continue
MADISON, Wis. (AP) — A judge refused Friday to toss out a lawsuit challenging Wisconsin's 174-year-old abortion ban, keeping the case inching toward the state Supreme Court in a state where debate over abortion rights has taken center stage.
Wisconsin lawmakers enacted statutes outlawing abortion in all cases except to save the mother's life in 1849, a year after Wisconsin became a state. The U.S. Supreme Court's landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling legalizing abortion had nullified the ban, but legislators never repealed it. Then, the high court's decision last June to overturn Roe v. Wade reactivated the statutes.
Michelle Velasquez, the Director of Legal Advocacy and Services for Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin, said, "We're, of course, celebrating this victory and see this decision as a victory."
But it's not yet the big one pro-choice advocates are hoping for. The state's abortion ban remains in effect for now, but the lawsuit against it can continue.
Wisconsin Attorney General Josh Kaul said, "Because this case is fundamentally a question of what the law is and what the law means, it's a very positive development."
The state's Democratic attorney general, Josh Kaul, has vowed to restore abortion access. He filed a lawsuit in Dane County days after Roe v. Wade was overturned, seeking to repeal the ban. Kaul argues that the ban is too old to enforce and that a 1985 law that permits abortions before a fetus can survive outside the womb supersedes the ban. Three doctors later joined the lawsuit as plaintiffs, saying they fear being prosecuted for performing abortions.
Many pro-life groups, like Wisconsin Family Action, expected Friday's decision.
Julaine Appling, president of Wisconsin Family Action, said, "She was going to continue this case. They want it before the State Supreme Court."
That's because on August 1, Justice-elect Janet Protasiewicz will flip control of the court to liberals once she's sworn in.
Appling said, "The timing on this whole lawsuit, in my opinion, has been geared for that moment when that balance shifts."
But Kaul argued, "This is an argument I believe we should win regardless of what the composition of our court is."
Kaul has named district attorneys in the three counties where abortion clinics operated until the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade as defendants. One of them, Sheboygan County's Republican district attorney, Joel Urmanski, filed a motion seeking to dismiss the case in December.
Urmanski maintains that it's a stretch to argue that the ban is so old it can no longer be enforced and that the 1985 law and the ban complement each other. Since the newer law outlaws abortions post-viability, it simply gives prosecutors another charging option, he contends.
Kaul's attorneys have countered that the two laws are in conflict and doctors need to know where they stand.
Friday's ruling is not the final decision on the abortion ban, and pro-life groups are still hopeful the ban will be upheld.
But while they wait, access to safe and legal abortion has been virtually eliminated.
Kaul said, "That's impacting the lives of Wisconsinites every day. Doctors need to make decisions all the time that could be impacted by this law."
Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin is not assuming the ban will be overturned.
A lot more planning is needed before abortion services would resume, and they don't want to repeatedly start and stop if there are more appeals.
Velasquez said, "It's something we really have to be highly considerate of."
Dane County Circuit Judge Diane Schlipper explained in a written ruling denying Urmanski's dismissal motion that the 1849 ban makes killing fetuses by assaulting or battering the mother illegal and doesn't apply to consensual abortion. That means the doctor plaintiffs could ultimately win a declaration that they can't be prosecuted for performing abortions and hence the case should continue, Schlipper wrote.
The ruling means that the lawsuit will continue in Schlipper's courtroom. Regardless of how the judge ultimately rules, the case carries so much weight for the future of the state that it almost certainly will rise to the state Supreme Court, which is exactly where Democrats want it.
Sheboygan County District Attorney Joel Urmanski, who filed the motion to dismiss the lawsuit, said he was not available for comment.
Liberal justices will control the court with a 4-3 majority after progressive Janet Protasiewicz is sworn in on Aug. 1. She stopped short on the campaign trail of saying how she would rule on a challenge to the 1849 ban but said repeatedly she supports abortion rights.
This is good news and a critical step in our fight to end our state’s criminal abortion ban and restore the reproductive freedom women had in Wisconsin until #SCOTUS overturned #Roe last June.
— Governor Tony Evers (@GovEvers) July 7, 2023
We must restore access to safe, legal abortion in Wisconsin. https://t.co/Ef3Q18Zr72